Bibliothek

@proceedings{Renz2017,
title = {Automatisierte Qualitätssicherung in MOOCs durch Learning Analytics},
author = {Jan Renz and Tobias Rohloff and Christoph Meinel},
editor = {Carsten Ullrich and Martin Wessner},
url = {http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2092/paper24.pdf
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/325226167_Automatisierte_Qualitatssicherung_in_MOOCs_durch_Learning_Analytics
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321105881_Automatisierte_Qualitatssicherung_in_MOOCs_durch_Learning_Analytics},
issn = {1613-0073},
year = {2017},
date = {2017-09-05},
urldate = {2018-12-20},
series = {CEUR Workshop Proceedings},
abstract = {Dieser Beitrag beschreibt wie mithilfe von Learning Analytics Daten eine automatisierte Qualitätssicherung in MOOCs durchgeführt werden kann. Die Ergebnisse sind auch für andere skalierende E-Learning Systeme anwendbar. Hierfür wird zunächst beschrieben, wie in den untersuchten Systemen (die als verteilte Dienste in einer Microservice-Architektur implementiert sind) Learning Analytics Werkzeuge umgesetzt sind. Darauf aufbauend werden Konzept und Implementierung einer automatisierten Qualitätssicherung beschrieben. In einer ersten Evaluation wird die Nutzung der Funktion auf einer Instanz der am HPI entwickelten MOOC-Plattform untersucht. Anschließend wird ein Ausblick auf Erweiterungen und zukünftige Forschungsfragen gegeben.},
howpublished = {Proceedings of DeLFI and GMWWorkshops 2017, Chemnitz, Germany, September 5, 2017},
keywords = {A, learning analytics, massive open online courses (MOOCs), Qualitätssicherung, quality},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {proceedings}
}

@article{Yuerekli17,
title = {Pedagogy in HE: does it matter?},
author = {Aynur Yürekli Kaynardağ},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2017.1340444},
doi = {10.1080/03075079.2017.1340444},
issn = {1470-174X},
year = {2017},
date = {2017-06-19},
urldate = {2019-02-16},
journal = {Studies in Higher Education},
volume = {44},
number = {1},
pages = {111–119},
publisher = {Routledge},
abstract = {Pedagogical competencies of instructors play a crucial role in improving the quality of the teaching and learning in higher education institutions. However, in many countries worldwide, pedagogical training is not a requirement for being an instructor at a university [Postareff, L., S. Lindblom-Ylänne, and A. Nevgi. 2007. “The Effect of Pedagogical Training on Teaching in Higher Education.” Teaching and Teacher Education 23: 557–71; Badley, G. 2000. “Developing Globally-Competent University Teachers.” Innovations in Education and Training International 37 (3): 244–53]. This study explores how pedagogical competencies of instructors affect the perceptions of students by focusing on three key dimensions of classroom pedagogy; namely delivery (provision of content and facilitation), communication and assessment. The results of the scale administered to a total of 1083 university students suggests that there are meaningful differences in terms of students’ perceptions regarding their instructors’ pedagogical competencies. The greatest difference is reflected in the ratings of items related to the communication dimension.},
keywords = {competence, higher education, O, pedagogy, quality, training},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}