Bibliothek

@collection{Bauer2020,
title = {Vom E-Learning zur Digitalisierung: Mythen, Realitäten, Perspektiven},
editor = {Reinhard Bauer and Jörg Hafer and Sandra Hofhues and Mandy Schiefner and Anne Thillosen and Benno Volk and Klaus Wannemacher},
isbn = {978-3-8309-4109-5},
year = {2020},
date = {2020-07-01},
volume = {76},
publisher = {Waxmann},
series = {Medien in der Wissenschaft},
abstract = {Der Begriff „Digitalisierung“ ist in aller Munde und häufig werden vor allem Anforderungen formuliert, die „digitale Transformation“ in allen Bereichen der Gesellschaft mitzugestalten. In diesem Zusammenhang wird insbesondere von Hochschulen als Forschungs- und Bildungsinstitutionen erwartet, diesen Wandel aktiv mitzugestalten.

Der Begriff „Digitalisierung“ erscheint einerseits als Heilsversprechen, andererseits ruft er auch Skepsis und Ängste hervor. Zugleich fällt auf, dass „Digitalisierung“ selten konkret definiert wird – vielmehr wird meist unhinterfragt vorausgesetzt, es gäbe einen Konsens, was im jeweiligen Kontext damit gemeint ist. Daher erscheint es besonders interessant, einschlägige Narrative im Zusammenhang mit dem Digitalisierungsbegriff offenzulegen und zu diskutieren sowie aus einer wissenschaftlichen und praktischen Sicht kritisch zu hinterfragen.

Im Band werden deswegen die Mythen und öffentlichen Vorstellungen rund um Medien und E-Learning in den Blick genommen. Hochschule bietet dazu den wesentlichen Referenzrahmen. Darüber hinaus wird nach Realitäten und Perspektiven in diesem unbestimmten Feld gesucht. In Zusammenhang mit dem Band hat die Fachgesellschaft GMW ganz unterschiedliche Personen und Akteure direkt sowie in einem Call dazu eingeladen, sich an der Diskussion um den Status quo im Bereich der Nutzung und Bedeutung von Medien in der Wissenschaft zu beteiligen. Dieser Band bildet damit sowohl den aktuellen Stand der Diskussion alsauch ihre fachlich-inhaltlichen, methodischen und konzeptionellen Facetten ab.},
keywords = {Digitalisierung, e-learning, Mythen},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {collection}
}

@article{Booher2020,
title = {What about research and evidence? Teachers’ perceptions and uses of education research to inform STEM teaching},
author = {Loi Booher and Louis S. Nadelson and Sandra G. Nadelson},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2020.1782811},
doi = {10.1080/00220671.2020.1782811},
year = {2020},
date = {2020-06-27},
journal = {The Journal of Educational Research},
pages = {1–13},
publisher = {Routledge},
abstract = {The use of research evidence to inform practice has become an expectation of those working in many professions. There is a dearth of research on teacher use of scholarship to inform their practice. While there is an abundance of research that can be used to inform teacher practice, there are unknowns about how much teachers seek, access, read, apply and share evidence from research to inform their teaching. We address this gap in the literature by surveying inservice teachers about their perceptions and practices for using education research. In our analysis of the data collected from 452 teachers, we found teachers are interested in research and perceive value in research to inform their work. However, we also found that teachers struggle to identify sources of quality research and how to translate research to inform their teaching. Our findings have implications for school administrators seeking to promote teacher engagement in evidence-based practice and educational researchers hoping to have their research translated into K-12 teacher practice.},
keywords = {Evidence-based practice, innovation, O, research informed teaching, teacher practice},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{Schmölz2020,
title = {Digitale Kluft: Teilhabebarrieren für Studierende durch universitäres home learning?},
author = {Alexander Schmölz and Corinna Geppert and Alessandro Barberi},
url = {https://doi.org/10.21243/mi-02-20-31
https://journals.univie.ac.at/index.php/mp/article/view/3644},
doi = {10.21243/mi-02-20-31},
issn = {2307-3187},
year = {2020},
date = {2020-06-20},
journal = {Medienimpulse},
volume = {58},
number = {2},
pages = {26},
abstract = {Die Nutzung von digitalen Medien zur Teilhabe an gesellschaftlichen und wirtschaftlichen Prozessen sowie die Teilhabebarrieren und die digitale Kluft sind seit dem Aufkommen der Computertechnologie ein zentrales Phänomen sozialer (Un-)Gleichheit. Dieser Artikel gilt der Untersuchung der digitalen Kluft im Zuge der Umstellung des Studienbetriebs auf „home-learning“ an den österreichischen Universitäten Anfang März 2020. Diese notwendige Umstellung der Lehre zielte auf die Verminderung der Kontaktmöglichkeiten und damit auf die Reduzierung der Ansteckungsgefahr mit COVID-19 ab. Dieser Artikel beleuchtet – auch im Sinne partizipatorischer Fragestellungen – die Herausforderungen, denen sich Studierende in Zeiten des „home-learning“ gegenübersahen, um an der digitalen Lehre teilhaben zu können. Im Rahmen der zugrundeliegenden Studie wurde untersucht, inwieweit die universitären Maßnahmen bezüglich „home-learning“ sowie weitere (nationale) Regelungen zu Teilhabebarrieren für Studierende wurden. Im Folgenden werden die Ergebnisse dieser Befragung (n=412) unter Studierenden der Bildungswissenschaft der Universität Wien zusammengefasst. Die Ergebnisse zeigen, dass nicht so sehr der technische Zugang zu Computer und Internet hinderlich ist, sondern vielmehr die Kompetenzanforderungen bestimmter Technologien, die Organisation von Tages- und Wochenabläufen sowie des eigenen Lernens und der Umgang der Lehrenden mit der Situation. Auch steigende Kursanforderungen, der Zugang zur Bibliothek, zunehmende Betreuungspflichten und der (drohende) Verlust des Arbeitsplatzes haben die Teilnahme am „home-learning“ erheblich beeinträchtigt.},
keywords = {A, Corona, Digitale Kluft, Digitale Medien, distance learning},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{Frick2020,
title = {Publikationskosten für Zeitschriftenartikel abseits von Open-Access-Publikationsfonds – Lost in Transformation?},
author = {Claudia Frick and Christian Kaier},
url = {https://doi.org/10.5282/o-bib/5586},
doi = {10.5282/o-bib/5586},
issn = {2363-9814},
year = {2020},
date = {2020-05-05},
urldate = {2020-05-28},
journal = {O-Bib. Das Offene Bibliotheksjournal},
volume = {7},
number = {2},
pages = {1–15},
organization = {VDB},
abstract = {Mit der Etablierung von Open Access als Standardmodell des wissenschaftlichen Publizierens verlagert sich der Fokus von Subskriptions- auf Publikationskosten. Die zuverlässige und vollständige Erfassung dieser Kosten stellt eine große Herausforderung für Bibliotheken und Institutionen dar. Gründe dafür sind dezentrale Rechnungsworkflows, unterschiedliche Kostenmodelle, Nebengebühren, ein Nebeneinander von Einzel- und Pauschalgebühren und die Vermischung von Subskriptions- und Publikationskosten. Der vorliegende Beitrag analysiert zunächst die Vielfalt der unterschiedlichen Ausgaben für Artikel in wissenschaftlichen Zeitschriften. Im Anschluss zeigt er zwei Ansätze der Erfassung von dezentralen Publikationskosten auf, die zu einer besseren Steuerung und mehr Transparenz der Ausgaben für das Publizieren beitragen.},
keywords = {A, Buchhaltung, Controlling, Monitoring, open access, Publikationsgebühren, Publikationskosten},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{Kerres2020,
title = {Against All Odds: Education in Germany Coping with Covid-19},
author = {Michael Kerres},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00130-7},
doi = {10.1007/s42438-020-00130-7},
year = {2020},
date = {2020-05-04},
journal = {Postdigital Science and Education},
keywords = {Covid-19, Culture, Digital Change, Educational Technology, Germany, O, Sociology},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{Carpenter2020,
title = {On Students’ (Mis)judgments of Learning and Teaching Effectiveness},
author = {Shana K. Carpenter and Amber E. Witherby and Sarah K. Tauber},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2019.12.009},
doi = {10.1016/j.jarmac.2019.12.009},
issn = {2211-3681},
year = {2020},
date = {2020-02-12},
journal = {Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition},
volume = {9},
number = {2},
pages = {137–151},
abstract = {Students’ judgments of their own learning are often misled by intuitive yet false ideas about how people learn. In educational settings, learning experiences that minimize effort and increase the appearance of fluency, engagement, and enthusiasm often inflate students’ estimates of their own learning, but do not always enhance their actual learning. We review the research on these “illusions of learning,” how they can mislead students’ evaluations of the effectiveness of their instructors, and how students’ evaluations of teaching effectiveness can be biased by factors unrelated to teaching. We argue that the heavy reliance on student evaluations of teaching in decisions about faculty hiring and promotion might encourage teaching practices that boost students’ subjective ratings of teaching effectiveness, but do not enhance—and may even undermine—students’ learning and their development of metacognitive skills.},
keywords = {Education, Illusions of learning, Learning, Metacognition, O, Teaching evaluations},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{Kestin2020,
title = {Comparing the effectiveness of online versus live lecture demonstrations},
author = {Greg Kestin and Kelly Miller and Logan S. McCarty and Kristina Callaghan and Louis Deslauriers},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.16.013101},
doi = {10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.16.013101},
issn = {2469-9896},
year = {2020},
date = {2020-01-29},
journal = {Physical Review Physics Education Research},
volume = {16},
number = {1},
abstract = {Nearly every introductory physics or chemistry course includes live lecture demonstrations, which can range from simple illustrations of a pendulum to elaborate productions with specialized apparatus and highly trained demonstrators. Students and instructors often consider “demos” to be among the highlights of these classes. Yet, in some situations demos may be cumbersome, inaccessible, or otherwise unavailable, and online video demos could offer a convenient alternative. We compared the effectiveness of live demonstrations with online videos under controlled conditions in the first semester of an introductory physics (mechanics) course. Students were randomly assigned to view either a live or video version of two demos. The same instructor presented both versions of the demo using an identical script, keeping the same time on task across both conditions, but with small differences in presentation appropriate to the medium. Compared with the students who saw the live demos, the students who watched the online videos learned more, and their self-reported enjoyment was just as high. We discuss reasons why videos helped students to learn more, including that they are more likely to make correct observations from the video. These results suggest that videos could provide students with an equally effective learning experience when live demos are unavailable. Indeed, even when live demonstrations are available, it may be beneficial to supplement them with online presentations.},
keywords = {demonstration, effectiveness, lectures, O, video},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{Altmeyer2020,
title = {The use of augmented reality to foster conceptual knowledge acquisition in STEM laboratory courses—Theoretical background and empirical results},
author = {Kristin Altmeyer and Sebastian Kapp and Michael Thees and Sarah Malone and Jochen Kuhn and Roland Brünken},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12900},
doi = {10.1111/bjet.12900},
year = {2020},
date = {2020-01-14},
urldate = {2020-04-23},
journal = {British Journal of Educational Technology},
abstract = {Learning with hands‐on experiments can be supported by providing essential information virtually during lab work. Augmented reality (AR) appears especially suitable for presenting information during experimentation, as it can be used to integrate both physical and virtual lab work. Virtual information can be displayed in close spatial proximity to the correspondent components in the experimentation environment, thereby ensuring a basic design principle for multimedia instruction: the spatial contiguity principle. The latter is assumed to reduce learners' extraneous cognitive load and foster generative processing, which supports conceptual knowledge acquisition. For the present study, a tablet‐based AR application has been developed to support learning from hands‐on experiments in physics education. Real‐time measurement data were displayed directly above the components of electric circuits, which were constructed by the learners during lab work. In a two group pretest–posttest design, we compared university students' (N = 50) perceived cognitive load and conceptual knowledge gain for both the AR‐supported and a matching non‐AR learning environment. Whereas participants in both conditions gave comparable ratings for cognitive load, learning gains in conceptual knowledge were only detectable for the AR‐supported lab work.},
keywords = {AR, augmented reality, O, STEM},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{Campbell2020,
title = {Student-created video: an active learning approach in online environments},
author = {Laurie O. Campbell and Samantha Heller and Lindsay Pulse},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1711777},
doi = {10.1080/10494820.2020.1711777},
issn = {1744-5191},
year = {2020},
date = {2020-01-08},
urldate = {2020-05-28},
journal = {Interactive Learning Environments},
abstract = {The purpose of this study was to investigate student-created video as an active learning approach in an online environment to inform instructional practices of student-created video in STEM. Data analyzed in this study included pre-service teachers N = 107, 1-minute videos and pre- and post surveys. The findings of this qualitative study indicated that student-created video was an active learning activity that contributed to an increase in students’ perceived STEM content knowledge, improved perceptions of self-efficacy, and evidence of student engagement inclusive of behavioral, affective, and cognitive domains. Themes derived from the participants’ perceptions included: perceived self-efficacy, novelty or usefulness of creating short video, time to design and create video, and content and technical knowledge. Student-created video as an active approach to learning can be included in STEM education to increase STEM knowledge and foster integrative twenty-first Century skills. Practical implications for educators when designing student-created video assignments include (a) following a video development model; (b) providing extra time for content acquisition and revisions; and (c) incorporating peer evaluations.},
keywords = {active learning, O, self-efficacy, STEM, Student-created video},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{Aikina2020,
title = {Moodle-Based Learning: Motivating and Demotivating Factors},
author = {Tatiana Yurievna Aikina and Liudmila Mikhailovna Bolsunovskaya},
url = {https://online-journals.org/index.php/i-jet/article/view/11297},
issn = {1863-0383},
year = {2020},
date = {2020-01-01},
journal = {International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET)},
volume = {15},
number = {02},
pages = {239–248},
abstract = {Over the past 10 years, a lot of universities worldwide have designed different online courses available to their students. The emergence of online courses makes Higher Education a more flexible and elastic concept. The present paper documents a qualitative study that examines motivating and demotivating factors in using Moodle for English language learning in higher schools. The survey encompasses data collected from 137 students and 20 teachers in a higher technical school (Russia) with a focus on students’ and teachers’ perception of Moodle-based learning. Analysis of the obtained data reveals a set of factors concerning pedagogical, technical, management approaches towards Moodle implementation. The results suggest further development of positive experiences and minimizing demotivating factors in online learning environment.},
keywords = {A, collaborative learning, e-learning, English language learning, innovative approach, Moodle},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@inbook{Birkner2020,
title = {MOOCs als offene Bildungsformate? Überlegungen zur Beschreibung und Analyse der Offenheit von Massive Open Online Courses},
author = {Achim Birkner and Johannes Fromme},
editor = {Olaf Dörner},
url = {https://www.meb.ovgu.de/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Birkner_Fromme_MOOCs-Preprint.pdf},
isbn = {978-3-8474-2227-3},
year = {2019},
date = {2019-12-16},
urldate = {2020-03-28},
booktitle = {Wissenschaftliche Weiterbildung als Problem der Öffnung von Hochschulen für nichttraditionelle Studierende},
pages = {209–227},
publisher = {Barbara Budrich},
address = { Opladen, Berlin, Toronto},
keywords = {A, massive open online courses (MOOCs), open education},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {inbook}
}

@article{Selwyn2019,
title = {What’s the Problem with Learning Analytics?},
author = {Neil Selwyn},
url = {https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2019.63.3},
doi = {10.18608/jla.2019.63.3},
year = {2019},
date = {2019-12-13},
journal = {Journal of Learning Analytics},
volume = {6},
number = {3},
pages = {11–19},
abstract = {This article summarizes some emerging concerns as learning analytics become implemented throughout education. The article takes a sociotechnical perspective — positioning learning analytics as shaped by a range of social, cultural, political, and economic factors. In this manner, various concerns are outlined regarding the propensity of learning analytics to entrench and deepen the status quo, disempower and disenfranchise vulnerable groups, and further subjugate public education to the profit-led machinations of the burgeoning “data economy.” In light of these charges, the article briefly considers some possible areas of change. These include the design of analytics applications that are more open and accessible, that offer genuine control and oversight to users, and that better reflect students’ lived reality. The article also considers ways of rethinking the political economy of the learning analytics industry. Above all, learning analytics researchers need to begin talking more openly about the values and politics of data-driven analytics technologies as they are implemented along mass lines throughout school and university contexts.},
keywords = {critical discussion, data economy, Education, learning analytics, O, social context},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@online{Doebeli2019,
title = {Argumente gegen das Digitale in der Schule},
author = {Beat Doebeli},
url = {http://mehrals0und1.ch/Argumente/},
year = {2019},
date = {2019-12-04},
urldate = {2020-02-27},
abstract = {In Diskussionen, Artikeln und Leserbriefen werden oft ähnliche Argumente gegen das Digitale in der Schule genannt. Es ist wichtig, diese Argumente zu kennen und sich mit ihnen auseinanderzusetzen. Gewisse sind unsinnig oder leicht zu widerlegen, andere gilt es durchaus zu bedenken und sind nicht von der Hand zu weisen.
Aus diesem Grund ist hier eine Sammlung von derzeit etwas mehr als 70 Argumenten gegen das Digitale in der Schule entstanden.},
howpublished = {Mehr als 0 und 1},
keywords = {Argumente, Digitalisierung, Mythen},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {online}
}

@article{Eskreis-Winkler2019,
title = {Not Learning From Failure—the Greatest Failure of All},
author = {Lauren Eskreis-Winkler and Ayelet Fishbach},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797619881133},
doi = {10.1177/0956797619881133},
issn = {1467-9280},
year = {2019},
date = {2019-11-08},
urldate = {2019-12-18},
journal = {Psychological science},
volume = {30},
number = {12},
pages = {1733–1744},
abstract = {Our society celebrates failure as a teachable moment. Yet in five studies (total N = 1,674), failure did the opposite: It undermined learning. Across studies, participants answered binary-choice questions, following which they were told they answered correctly (success feedback) or incorrectly (failure feedback). Both types of feedback conveyed the correct answer, because there were only two answer choices. However, on a follow-up test, participants learned less from failure feedback than from success feedback. This effect was replicated across professional, linguistic, and social domains—even when learning from failure was less cognitively taxing than learning from success and even when learning was incentivized. Participants who received failure feedback also remembered fewer of their answer choices. Why does failure undermine learning? Failure is ego threatening, which causes people to tune out. Participants learned less from personal failure than from personal success, yet they learned just as much from other people’s failure as from others’ success. Thus, when ego concerns are muted, people tune in and learn from failure.},
keywords = {ego threat, failure, feedback, Learning, motivation, O, open data, open materials, preregistered},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@book{DeBruyckere2019,
title = {More Urban Myths About Learning and Education: Challenging Eduquacks, Extraordinary Claims, and Alternative Facts},
author = {Pedro De Bruyckere and Paul A. Kirschner and Casper D. Hulshof},
isbn = {978-0815354581},
year = {2019},
date = {2019-10-11},
publisher = {Routledge},
address = {New York},
abstract = {More Urban Myths About Learning and Education: Challenging Eduquacks, Extraordinary Claims, and Alternative Facts examines common beliefs about education and learning that are not supported by scientific evidence before using research to reveal the truth about each topic. The book comprises sections on educational approaches, curriculum, educational psychology, and educational policy, concluding with a critical look at evidence-based education itself. Does playing chess improve intelligence? Should tablets and keyboards replace handwriting? Is there any truth to the 10,000-hour rule for expertise? In an engaging, conversational style, authors Pedro De Bruyckere, Paul A. Kirschner, and Casper Hulshof tackle a set of pervasive myths, effectively separating fact from fiction in learning and education.},
keywords = {Mythen},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {book}
}

@inproceedings{Hobert2019,
title = {How Are You, Chatbot? Evaluating Chatbots in Educational Settings – Results of a Literature Review},
author = {Sebastian Hobert},
editor = {Niels Pinkwart and Johannes Konert},
url = {https://dx.doi.org/10.18420/delfi2019_289},
doi = {10.18420/delfi2019_289},
isbn = {978-3-88579-691-6},
year = {2019},
date = {2019-09-16},
booktitle = {DELFI 2019},
pages = {259–270},
publisher = {Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V.},
address = {Bonn},
abstract = {Evaluation studies are essential for determining the utilization of technology-enhanced learning systems. Prior research often focuses on evaluating specific factors like the technology adoption or usability aspects. However, it needs to be questioned if evaluating only specific factors is appropriate in each case. The aim of this research paper is to outline which methods are suited for evaluating technology-enhanced learning systems in interdisciplinary research domains. Specifically, we focus our analysis on pedagogical conversational agents – i.e. learning systems that interact with learners using natural language. For instance, in addition to technology acceptance, further factors like learning success are more important in this case. Based on this assumption, we analyze the current state-of-the-art literature of pedagogical conversational agents to identify evaluation objectives, procedures and measuring instruments. Afterward, we use the results to propose a guideline for evaluations of pedagogical conversational agents.},
keywords = {A, chatbots, evaluation, pedagogical conversational agents, technology-enhanced learning},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {inproceedings}
}

@article{Schaefer2019,
title = {Open-label placebos reduce test anxiety and improve self-management skills: A randomized-controlled trial},
author = {Michael Schaefer and Claudia Denke and Rebecca Harke and Nina Olk and Merve Erkovan and Sören Enge},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-49466-6},
doi = {10.1038/s41598-019-49466-6},
issn = {2045-2322},
year = {2019},
date = {2019-09-16},
urldate = {2019-12-18},
journal = {Nature Scientific Reports},
volume = {9},
number = {13317},
abstract = {Test anxiety is a condition in which people experience extreme distress and anxiety before and in test situations. It affects up to 40 percent of all students. Conventional treatment includes both medication and psychotherapy, but studies also demonstrated that placebos affect anxiety symptoms. Although in the traditional understanding placebos need to be administered in a concealed way, intriguing new studies report that open-label placebos can be effective. Since prescription of fake pills involves ethical problems, open-label placebos may provide important new treatment possibilities. Here we report results of a pilot study examining whether open-label placebos may reduce test anxiety and improve self-management skills. 58 students participated in a two-group randomized controlled trial. Two weeks before an exam at the university participants received open-label placebos or no pills (control group). Participant – provider relationship and amount of contact time was held similar for all groups. After two weeks we found that test anxiety and self-management abilities (skills and resources) of the open-label placebo group were more improved than in the control group. Thus, our results seems to indicate that open-label placebos may reduce test anxiety and enhance self-management skills in students.},
keywords = {A, open label placebo, placebo effect, test anxiety},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{Låg2019,
title = {Does the Flipped Classroom Improve Student Learning and Satisfaction? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis},
author = {Torstein Låg and Rannveig Grøm Sæle},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858419870489},
doi = {10.1177/2332858419870489},
isbn = {9781544389769},
year = {2019},
date = {2019-08-20},
journal = {AERA Open},
volume = {5},
number = {3},
abstract = {We searched and meta-analyzed studies comparing flipped classroom teaching with traditional, lecture-based teaching to evaluate the evidence for the flipped classroom’s influence on continuous-learning measures, pass/fail rates, and student evaluations of teaching. Eight electronic reference databases were searched to retrieve relevant studies. Our results indicate a small effect in favor of the flipped classroom on learning (Hedges’ g = 0.35, 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.31, 0.40], k = 272). However, analyses restricted to studies with sufficient power resulted in an estimate of 0.24 (95% CI [0.18, 0.31], k = 90). Effects on pass rates (odds ratio = 1.55, 95% CI [1.34, 1.78], k = 45) and student satisfaction (Hedges’ g = 0.16, 95% CI [0.06, 0.26], k = 69) were small and also likely influenced by publication bias. There is some support for the notion that the positive impact on learning may increase slightly if testing student preparation is part of the implementation.},
keywords = {achievement, active learning, classroom research, flipped classroom, learning environments, meta-analysis, O, publication bias, systematic review},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{Hilton2019,
title = {Open educational resources, student efficacy, and user perceptions: a synthesis of research published between 2015 and 2018},
author = {John Hilton},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09700-4},
doi = {10.1007/s11423-019-09700-4},
issn = {1556-6501},
year = {2019},
date = {2019-08-06},
journal = {Educational Technology Research and Development},
abstract = {Although textbooks are a traditional component in many higher education contexts, their increasing price have led many students to forgo purchasing them and some faculty to seek substitutes. One such alternative is open educational resources (OER). This present study synthesizes results from sixteen efficacy and twenty perceptions studies involving 121,168 students or faculty that examine either (1) OER and student efficacy in higher education settings or (2) the perceptions of college students and/or instructors who have used OER. Results across these studies suggest students achieve the same or better learning outcomes when using OER while saving significant amounts of money. The results also indicate that the majority of faculty and students who have used OER had a positive experience and would do so again.},
keywords = {A, Computers in education, Financing education, O, OER, open educational resources},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{Dacrema2019,
title = {Are We Really Making Much Progress? A Worrying Analysis of Recent Neural Recommendation Approaches},
author = {Maurizio Ferrari Dacrema and Paolo Cremonesi and Dietmar Jannach},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/1907.06902
https://dblp.org/rec/bib/journals/corr/abs-1907-06902},
year = {2019},
date = {2019-07-23},
urldate = {2019-08-08},
journal = {Proceedings of the 13th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys 2019)},
abstract = {Deep learning techniques have become the method of choice for researchers working on algorithmic aspects of recommender systems. With the strongly increased interest in machine learning in general, it has, as a result, become difficult to keep track of what represents the state-of-the-art at the moment, e.g., for top-n recommendation tasks. At the same time, several recent publications point out problems in today's research practice in applied machine learning, e.g., in terms of the reproducibility of the results or the choice of the baselines when proposing new models. In this work, we report the results of a systematic analysis of algorithmic proposals for top-n recommendation tasks. Specifically, we considered 18 algorithms that were presented at top-level research conferences in the last years. Only 7 of them could be reproduced with reasonable effort. For these methods, it however turned out that 6 of them can often be outperformed with comparably simple heuristic methods, e.g., based on nearest-neighbor or graph-based techniques. The remaining one clearly outperformed the baselines but did not consistently outperform a well-tuned non-neural linear ranking method. Overall, our work sheds light on a number of potential problems in today's machine learning scholarship and calls for improved scientific practices in this area. },
keywords = {evolutionary computing, information retrieval, machine learning, neural computing, O},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{Perini2019,
title = {Using Hypervideo to support undergraduate students’ reflection on work practices: a qualitative study},
author = {Marco Perini and Alberto A.P. Cattaneo and Guiseppe Tacconi},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0156-z},
doi = {10.1186/s41239-019-0156-z},
issn = {2365-9440},
year = {2019},
date = {2019-07-19},
urldate = {2019-08-08},
journal = {International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education},
volume = {16},
number = {1},
pages = {29},
publisher = {Springer International Publishing},
abstract = {According to several exploratory studies, the HyperVideo seems to be particularly useful in highlighting the existing connections between the school-based and the work-based contexts, between authentic work situations and theoretical underpinnings. This tool and its features, in particular, the video annotation, seems to constitute an instrument which facilitates the students' reflection on work-practices. Even though several researchers have already studied the efficacy of HyperVideo, studies concerning the qualitative differences between a reflection process activated with or without its use are still missing. Therefore, the present contribution is focused on the reflective processes activated by two groups of students engaged in a higher education course while they carry out a reflective activity on work practices using the HyperVideo or not. The aim is to investigate wether the HyperVideo can be useful for students to foster the connection between theoretical concepts and work practices. Through multi-step qualitative analysis which combined Thematic Qualitative Text Analysis and Grounded Theory, a sample of reflective reports drafted by a group of students who employed HiperVideo to make a video-interview on a work-practice and to reflect on it (Group A) was compared with a sample of reflective reports drafted by a group who did not use it to complete the same task (Group B).},
keywords = {crossing boundaries, educational technologies, hypervideo, O, reflective activities, video annotation},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{Kim2019,
title = {LumièreNet: Lecture Video Synthesis from Audio},
author = {Byung-Hak Kim and Varun Ganapathi},
url = {http://arxiv.org/abs/1907.02253
https://dblp.org/rec/bib/journals/corr/abs-1907-02253},
year = {2019},
date = {2019-07-08},
urldate = {2019-08-08},
journal = {CoRR},
volume = {bs/1907.02253},
abstract = {We present LumièreNet, a simple, modular, and completely deep-learning based architecture that synthesizes, high quality, full-pose headshot lecture videos from instructor's new audio narration of any length. Unlike prior works, LumièreNet is entirely composed of trainable neural network modules to learn mapping functions from the audio to video through (intermediate) estimated pose-based compact and abstract latent codes. Our video demos are available at [22] and [23].},
keywords = {audio processing, computer vision, lectures, machine learning, O, pattern recognition, speech processing},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{Gerhards2019,
title = {Des Kaisers alte Kleider: Fiktion und Wirklichkeit des Nutzens von Lateinkenntnissen},
author = {Jürgen Gerhards and Tim Sawert and Ulrich Kohler},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s11577-019-00624-8},
doi = {10.1007/s11577-019-00624-8},
issn = {1861-891X},
year = {2019},
date = {2019-07-08},
journal = {KZfSS Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie},
volume = {71},
number = {2},
pages = {309–326|},
publisher = {Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden},
abstract = {Obwohl Latein eine nicht mehr gesprochene Sprache ist und ihr deswegen kein kommunikativer Nutzen zukommt, ist die Anzahl der Latein als Schulfach wählenden Schüler im Zeitverlauf angestiegen. Mehrere Studien haben zudem gezeigt, dass Lateinkenntnisse weder das logische Denken, noch den Erwerb anderer Sprachen, noch das Gespür für die grammatikalische Struktur der Muttersprache verbessern. Auch wenn sich empirisch keine Vorteile des Erwerbs alter Sprachen nachweisen lassen, können Menschen subjektiv an solche Vorteile glauben und ihr Verhalten an ihrer Konstruktion von Wirklichkeit ausrichten. Auf der Basis einer unter Eltern von Gymnasialschülern durchgeführten Befragung zeigen wir, dass Latein umfassende Transfereffekte zugeschrieben und Personen mit Lateinkenntnissen positiver bewertet werden als Personen mit Kenntnissen moderner Sprachen. Weiterhin zeigt sich, dass die „Illusio“ der Vorteile von Latein zwar in allen Bildungsgruppen wirksam ist, doch besonders von den Hochgebildeten vertreten wird. Sie arbeiten damit an der Konstruktion einer Realität, von der sie selbst die größten Nutznießer sind, indem sie Latein als symbolisches Kapital verwenden.},
keywords = {Bildung, Latein, Mythen, Symbolisches Kapital, Thomas-Theorem},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@online{Wikipedianer2019AdaLovelace,
title = {Ada Lovelace},
author = {Wikipedianer},
url = {https://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ada_Lovelace&oldid=189780475},
year = {2019},
date = {2019-06-22},
urldate = {2019-06-27},
keywords = {A, Ada Lovelace},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {online}
}

@article{Harring2019,
title = {Higher education, norm development, and environmental protection},
author = {Niklas Harring and Sverker C. Jagers and Simon Matti},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-019-00410-7},
doi = {10.1007/s10734-019-00410-7},
issn = {1573-174X},
year = {2019},
date = {2019-06-21},
journal = {Higher Education},
abstract = {There is a debate on whether higher education in the social sciences generates stronger democratic and environmental norms among students. In our study, we focus on students' perceptions about legitimate rule in the case of environmental protection. We contribute to this debate by using a unique longitudinal data set from seven universities and university colleges in Sweden. Our results show that higher education in the social sciences does not generate stronger democratic or environmental norms, at least not in the case of environmental protection. We discuss why this is the case and refine our results further by looking at individual-level factors, such as gender and ideology.},
keywords = {higher education, norms, O, policy support, sustainability, values},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{Otto2019,
title = {Can MOOCs empower people to critically think about climate change? A learning outcome based comparison of two MOOCs},
author = {Daniel Otto and Sandra Caeiro and Paula Nicolau and Antje Disterheft and António Teixeira and Sara Becker and Alexander Bollmann and Kirsten Sander},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.190},
doi = {10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.190},
issn = {0959-6526},
year = {2019},
date = {2019-06-10},
urldate = {2019-06-27},
journal = {Journal of Cleaner Production},
volume = {222},
pages = {12–21},
publisher = {Elsevier},
abstract = {Climate change can be regarded as one of the key topics of sustainable development where public awareness and education are crucial. In the field of education, Massive Online Open Courses (MOOCs) have raised remarkable attention throughout the last decade as their initial objective is to provide massive open online education for everyone. This article aims to explore the impact of MOOCs on learning about climate change. This is necessary in order to evaluate whether MOOCs can make a substantial contribution to lifelong learning about sustainable development for a wider audience. We therefore present findings from self-assessment questionnaires of participants from two climate change MOOCs provided by two-distance learning universities in Germany and Portugal. Both MOOCs aimed at imparting to the participants the competencies to better understand the topic of climate change. The objective of the survey was a competency-based evaluation to review which learning outcomes have been achieved. The results indicate that taking part in either of the MOOCs increased the participants’ competencies to critically engage in the climate change debate. MOOCs are able to convey certain learning outcomes to the students and thus can contribute to climate change literacy. For further research, we recommend a more differentiated view on MOOCs and the learning opportunities for participants. Options for potential improvement are to think of better ways of how to integrate MOOCs into climate change education or to consider possibilities to increase the attractiveness of MOOCs for instance by using innovative formats to overcome the barriers between formal and informal learning.},
keywords = {Climate change education, climate literacy, distance learning, massive open online courses (MOOCs), O, open education, sustainability},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@inproceedings{Bruechner2019,
title = {Creating a Framework for User-Centered Development and Improvement of Digital Education},
author = {Dominik Bruechner and Jan Renz and Mandy Klingbeil},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1145/3330430.3333644},
doi = {10.1145/3330430.3333644},
isbn = {9781450368049},
year = {2019},
date = {2019-06-01},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the Sixth (2019) ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale},
number = {31},
publisher = {Association for Computing Machinery},
address = {New York, NY, USA},
abstract = {We investigate how the technology acceptance and learning experience of the digital education platform HPI Schul-Cloud (HPI School Cloud) for German secondary school teachers can be improved by proposing a user-centered research and development framework. We highlight the importance of developing digital learning technologies in a user-centered way to take differences in the requirements of educators and students into account. We suggest applying qualitative and quantitative methods to build a solid understanding of a learning platform's users, their needs, requirements, and their context of use. After concept development and idea generation of features and areas of opportunity based on the user research, we emphasize on the application of a multi-attribute utility analysis decision-making framework to prioritize ideas rationally, taking results of user research into account. Afterward, we recommend applying the principle build-learn-iterate to build prototypes in different resolutions while learning from user tests and improving the selected opportunities. Last but not least, we propose an approach for continuous short- and long-term user experience controlling and monitoring, extending existing web- and learning analytics metrics.},
keywords = {evaluation, HPI Schul-Cloud, learning platform, O, user experience, user research framework, user-centered design},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {inproceedings}
}

@inproceedings{Leitner2019,
title = {Experiences with a MOOC-platform – Who are our learners and what do they think about MOOCs?},
author = {Philipp Leitner and Martin Ebner},
url = {http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2356/
http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2356/experience_short14.pdf
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/333446168_Experiences_with_a_MOOC-platform_-Who_are_our_learners_and_what_do_they_think_about_MOOCs},
issn = {1613-0073},
year = {2019},
date = {2019-05-20},
urldate = {2019-08-08},
booktitle = {Proceedings of Work in Progress Papers of the Research, Experience and Business Tracks at EMOOCs 2019},
volume = {2356},
abstract = {iMooX, the first and currently only Austrian MOOC platform, has been hosting xMOOCs since 2014. Directly after the start a survey of the first three MOOCs was conducted and published in 2015. In the meantime, the MOOC platform contains more than 45 courses and serves many thousands of learners. Therefore, we are investigating, if there is a change towards the learners themselves, their expectations and experiences regarding learning with MOOCs as well as with the platform. Using the exact same survey as years before it can be shown that there are little changes in the right directions or maybe it can be concluded that learning with MOOCs became more common to a broader public, at least in the academic world.},
keywords = {A, iMooX, massive open online courses (MOOCs), online survey, quantitative assessment},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {inproceedings}
}

@inproceedings{Neuböck2019,
title = {What do we know about typical MOOC participants? First insights from the field},
author = {Kristina Neuböck and Michael Kopp and Martin Ebner},
url = {https://www.researchgate.net/publication/276473928_What_do_we_know_about_typical_MOOC_participants_First_insights_from_the_field},
year = {2019},
date = {2019-05-20},
urldate = {2019-08-08},
booktitle = {Proceedings of eMOOCs 2015 conference},
pages = {183–190},
address = {Mons},
abstract = {assive Open Online Courses became a worldwide phenomenon. Especially in Central Europe it is a subject of debates whether universities should invest more money or not. This research study likes to give first answers about typical MOOC participants based on data from different field studies of the Austrian MOOC-platform iMooX.
It can be pointed out that the typical learner is a student or an adult learner, strongly interested in the course topic or just interested in learning with media and finally with self- contained learning competencies. The research work concludes that MOOCs broaden the educational field for universities and are a possibility to educate the public in a long run.},
keywords = {A, iMooX, massive open online courses (MOOCs), online survey, quantitative assessment},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {inproceedings}
}

@online{Höfler2019,
title = {10 Mythen des digitalen Lernens},
author = {Elke Höfler},
url = {https://www.virtuelle-ph.at/veranstaltung/electure-10-mythen-des-digitalen-lernens/},
year = {2019},
date = {2019-02-19},
urldate = {2020-02-27},
abstract = {eschäftigt man sich mit dem Komplex „digitale Bildung“ erkennt man schnell, dass es einige Argumente gibt, die in Diskussionen immer wieder aufkommen oder auch in wissenschaftlichen Beiträgen gerne zitiert werden. Vielfach handelt es sich um Mythen, die es aufzudecken gilt. Diesen Versuch unternimmt diese eLecture und stellt 10 Mythen zur allgemeinen Diskussion.

Elke Höfler ist Sprachenlehrerin (Französisch/Italienisch) und zurzeit Lecturer an der Universität Graz (Fach- und Mediendidaktik). Sie lehrt an der Universität Graz, der FH Burgenland. der Donau-Universität Krems und hält immer wieder Fortbildungen an Pädagogischen Hochschulen in Österreich sowie an der Virtuellen PH. Ihre Arbeitsschwerpunkte sind Mediendidaktik, digitale Medien, Fiktionstheorie, Kriminalliteratur, YouTube-Stars, MOOCs, E-Books, audiovisuelle Medien, Spracherwerb und Sprachdidaktik.

Ziel dieser eLecture ist es, allgemeine Mythen zu identifizieren, benennen und aus unterschiedlichen Perspektiven zu beleuchten. Die Teilnehmer/innen sollen direkt in die Diskussion eingebunden sein.},
howpublished = {eLecture (Aufzeichnung)},
keywords = {Digitalisierung, Mythen},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {online}
}

@article{Marsh2019,
title = {The Digital Expansion of the Mind: Implications of Internet Usage for Memory and Cognition},
author = {Elizabeth J. Marsh and Suparna Rajaram},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2018.11.001},
doi = {10.1016/j.jarmac.2018.11.001},
issn = {2211-3681},
year = {2019},
date = {2019-01-19},
journal = {Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition},
volume = {8},
number = {1},
pages = {1–14},
publisher = {Elsevier},
abstract = {The internet is rapidly changing what information is available as well as how we find it and share it with others. Here we examine how this “digital expansion of the mind” changes cognition. We begin by identifying ten properties of the internet that likely affect cognition, roughly organized around internet content (e.g., the sheer amount of information available), internet usage (e.g., the requirement to search for information), and the people and communities who create and propagate content (e.g., people are connected in an unprecedented fashion). We use these properties to explain (or ask questions about) internet-related phenomena, such as habitual reliance on the internet, the propagation of misinformation, and consequences for autobiographical memory, among others. Our goal is to consider the impact of internet usage on many aspects of cognition, as people increasingly rely on the internet to seek, post, and share information.},
keywords = {Cognition, External memory, Internet, memory, Metacognition, O, Social memory},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{Orben2019,
title = {The association between adolescent well-being and digital technology use},
author = {Amy Orben and Andrew K. Przybylski},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0506-1},
doi = {10.1038/s41562-018-0506-1},
issn = {2397-3374},
year = {2019},
date = {2019-01-14},
journal = {Nature Human Behaviour},
abstract = {The widespread use of digital technologies by young people has spurred speculation that their regular use negatively impacts psychological well-being. Current empirical evidence supporting this idea is largely based on secondary analyses of large-scale social datasets. Though these datasets provide a valuable resource for highly powered investigations, their many variables and observations are often explored with an analytical flexibility that marks small effects as statistically significant, thereby leading to potential false positives and conflicting results. Here we address these methodological challenges by applying specification curve analysis (SCA) across three large-scale social datasets (total n = 355,358) to rigorously examine correlational evidence for the effects of digital technology on adolescents. The association we find between digital technology use and adolescent well-being is negative but small, explaining at most 0.4% of the variation in well-being. Taking the broader context of the data into account suggests that these effects are too small to warrant policy change.},
keywords = {adolescent, O, specification curve analysis (SCA), technology use, well-being},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{Reich2019,
title = {The MOOC pivot},
author = {Justin Reich and José A. Ruipérez-Valiente},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.aav7958},
doi = {10.1126/science.aav7958},
issn = {1095-9203},
year = {2019},
date = {2019-01-11},
journal = {Science},
volume = {363},
number = {6423},
pages = {130–131},
abstract = {When massive open online courses (MOOCs) first captured global attention in 2012, advocates imagined a disruptive transformation in postsecondary education. Video lectures from the world's best professors could be broadcast to the farthest reaches of the networked world, and students could demonstrate proficiency using innovative computer-graded assessments, even in places with limited access to traditional education. But after promising a reordering of higher education, we see the field instead coalescing around a different, much older business model: helping universities outsource their online master's degrees for professionals (1). To better understand the reasons for this shift, we highlight three patterns emerging from data on MOOCs provided by Harvard University and Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) via the edX platform: The vast majority of MOOC learners never return after their first year, the growth in MOOC participation has been concentrated almost entirely in the world's most affluent countries, and the bane of MOOCs—low completion rates (2)—has not improved over 6 years.},
keywords = {higher education, massive open online courses (MOOCs), O},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{Lemke2019,
title = {“When You Use Social Media You Are Not Working”: Barriers for the Use of Metrics in Social Sciences},
author = {Steffen Lemke and Maryam Mehrazar and Athanasios Mazarakis and Isabella Peters},
url = {https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2018.00039},
doi = {10.3389/frma.2018.00039},
issn = {2504–0537},
year = {2019},
date = {2019-01-08},
journal = {Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics},
volume = {3},
pages = {39},
abstract = {The Social Sciences have long been struggling with quantitative forms of research assessment – insufficient coverage in prominent citation indices and overall lower citation counts than in STM subject areas have led to a widespread weariness regarding bibliometric evaluations among social scientists. Fueled by the rise of the social web, new hope is often placed on alternative metrics that measure the attention scholarly publications receive online, in particular on social media. But almost a decade after the coining of the term altmetrics for this new group of indicators, the uptake of the concept in the Social Sciences still seems to be low. Just like with traditional bibliometric indicators, one central problem hindering the applicability of altmetrics for the Social Sciences is the low coverage of social science publications on the respective data sources – which in the case of altmetrics are the various social media platforms on which interactions with scientific outputs can be measured. Another reason is that social scientists have strong opinions about the usefulness of metrics for research evaluation which may hinder broad acceptance of altmetrics too.
We conducted qualitative interviews and online surveys with researchers to identify the concerns which inhibit the use of social media and the utilization of metrics for research evaluation in the Social Sciences. By analyzing the response data from the interviews in conjunction with the response data from the surveys, we identify the key concerns that inhibit social scientists from (1) applying social media for professional purposes and (2) making use of the wide array of metrics available.
Our findings show that aspects of time consumption, privacy, dealing with information overload, and prevalent styles of communication are predominant concerns inhibiting Social Science researchers from using social media platforms for their work. Regarding indicators for research impact we identify a widespread lack of knowledge about existing metrics, their methodologies and meanings as a major hindrance for their uptake through social scientists. The results have implications for future developments of scholarly online tools and show that researchers could benefit considerably from additional formal training regarding the correct application and interpretation of metrics.},
keywords = {A, altmetrics, bibliometrics, concerns, interviews, online survey, research assessment, social media usage},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@online{Klexikon2019adaLovelace,
title = {Ada Lovelace},
author = {Klexikonianer},
url = {https://klexikon.zum.de/index.php?title=Ada_Lovelace&oldid=88296},
year = {2018},
date = {2018-12-31},
urldate = {2019-06-27},
keywords = {A, Ada Lovelace},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {online}
}

@online{Wikipedia2019Kopernikus,
title = {Nikolaus Kopernikus},
author = {Wikipedianer},
url = {https://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nikolaus_Kopernikus&oldid=184010871},
year = {2018},
date = {2018-12-25},
urldate = {2019-02-16},
organization = {Wikipedia},
keywords = {A, Astronomie, Nikolaus Kopernikus},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {online}
}

@online{Klexikon2019Kopernikus,
title = {Nikolaus Kopernikus},
author = {Klexikonianer},
url = {https://klexikon.zum.de/index.php?title=Nikolaus_Kopernikus&oldid=83283},
year = {2018},
date = {2018-10-28},
urldate = {2019-02-16},
keywords = {A, Astronomie, Nikolaus Kopernikus},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {online}
}

@article{Könitz_2018,
title = {OER – Auf dem Weg in eine selbstverschuldete digitale Unmündigkeit?},
author = {Christopher Könitz},
url = {https://www.medienpaed.com/article/view/609},
doi = {10.21240/mpaed/32/2018.10.24.X},
issn = {1424-3636},
year = {2018},
date = {2018-10-24},
urldate = {2018-12-20},
journal = {MedienPädagogik: Zeitschrift für Theorie und Praxis der Medienbildung},
volume = {32},
number = {Oktober},
pages = {63–71},
abstract = {Spätestens seit der Debatte um die Vergütung von urheberrechtlich geschütztem Material nach UrhG §52a, scheinen Open Educational Resources (OER) die Antwort auf proprietäre Verlagsangebote zu sein. Jedoch gibt es lizenzrechtliche, technische und begriffliche Unschärfen, die dazu führen, dass OER in eine selbstverschuldete digitale Unmündigkeit führen können. Dieser Beitrag liefert daher im Kern eine kritische Auseinandersetzung mit dem OER-Begriff aus einer bildungstheoretisch-medienpädagogischen Perspektive. Im ersten Teil werden die genannten Unschärfen näher beleuchtet und erste Lösungsansätze aufzeigt. Der Beitrag plädiert für eine Hinwendung zu einem starken Copyleft, welches derzeit mit den Creative Commons nicht möglich ist, da diese unter Umständen zu proprietären Materialen führen können. Die technische Perspektive richtet sich auf die verwendeten Dateiformate von OER, die häufig nicht frei und/oder editierbar sind. Die begriffliche Perspektive stellt heraus, dass der OER-Begriff ein negatives Konzept von Freiheit verfolgen und mit Blick auf die Medienpädagogik untertheoretisiert sind.

Im zweiten Teil werden daher durch das Medienkompetenzmodell nach Baacke und der Strukturalen Medienbildung nach Jörissen und Marotzki zwei mögliche medienpädagogische Anschlüsse geschaffen. Durch diese Anschlüsse werden die Momente der Medienkritik und der Reflexivität eingebracht. Damit wird der Fokus von einer Outputorientierung auf den Aufbau eines Orientierungswissens – und damit auf transformatorische Bildungsprozesse und den damit verbundenen medialen Artikulationen – verschoben.},
keywords = {O, OER, open educational resources},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{Reder2018,
title = {Offene Bildungspraxis erlebbar machen – die Rolle von Podcasts für Projektdokumentationen und Reflexionsprozesse},
author = {Constanze Reder and Bence Lukács},
url = {https://www.medienpaed.com/article/view/610},
doi = {10.21240/mpaed/32/2018.10.20.X},
issn = {1424-3636},
year = {2018},
date = {2018-10-20},
journal = {MedienPädagogik: Zeitschrift für Theorie und Praxis der Medienbildung},
volume = {32},
pages = {17–27},
abstract = {Der vorliegende Beitrag widmet sich der Frage, wie Reflexion als Teil akademischer Medienkompetenz an Hochschulen adressiert werden kann. Als Beispiel dient ein Praxisprojekt, über das Studierende in labs mit Open Educational Resources (frei verfügbares Bildungsmaterial, OER), aber darüber hinaus vor allem mit Open Educational Practices (offenen Bildungspraktiken, OEP) und offenen Lehrinhalten in Kontakt kommen. Dabei stehen auch andere hochschulische Akteursgruppen im Fokus, die gemeinsam mit den Studierenden in moderierten Dialogen darüber beraten, wie nicht nur OER sondern auch OEP an der Hochschule etabliert werden können, um Dozierenden wie Studierenden den Zugang zu offener Bildung zu erleichtern. Ausgehend von dieser Praxiserfahrung greift der Artikel den Baustein des projektbegleitenden Podcasts heraus, der die Anlage des Projekts dokumentiert, aber auch ein reflexives Element im Doing darstellt, durch das die verschiedenen Perspektiven der Mitarbeitenden an den beiden Standorten, aber auch die von Stakeholdern und Kooperationsakteurinnen und Kooperationsakteuren widergespiegelt wird. Er widmet sich der Frage, wie dementsprechend ein reflektierter Umgang mit offener Lehr-Lernpraxis an der Hochschule unterstützt werden kann und wie offene Praxis nicht nur als Seminarinhalt, sondern auch nachhaltig als Teil von Hochschulentwicklungsprojekten implementiert werden kann.},
keywords = {Hochschule, O, OER, Podcasts},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{Leuchtenbörger2018,
title = {Erstellung und Weiterentwicklung von Open Educational Resources im Selbstversuch},
author = {Jens Leuchtenbörger},
url = {https://www.medienpaed.com/article/view/651},
doi = {10.21240/mpaed/34/2019.03.02.X},
issn = {1424-3636},
year = {2018},
date = {2018-10-20},
journal = {MedienPädagogik: Zeitschrift für Theorie und Praxis der Medienbildung},
volume = {32},
pages = {101–117},
abstract = {Open Educational Resources (OER) versprechen einerseits den Abbau von Hürden im Bildungszugang und andererseits die Vermeidung redundanter Arbeit bei der Erstellung ähnlicher und gleichzeitig qualitativ hochwertiger Bildungsressourcen in unterschiedlichen Organisationen. Der Verbreitung von OER stehen jedoch bekannte Hürden gegenüber, wobei das ALMS-Framework einen Rahmen für die Bewertung der Wieder- und Weiternutzung von OER aus technischer Sicht bereitstellt. Ausgehend von einem Selbstversuch zur OER-Einführung werden in dieser Arbeit das ALMS-Framework erweiternde Anforderungen an OER basierend auf Konzepten aus Software-Entwicklung und technischem Schreiben definiert. Unter Beachtung dieser Anforderungen werden zwei OER-Projekte beschrieben: Zum einen wird die Weiterentwicklung eines Lehrbuchs unter Creative-Commons-Lizenz skizziert. Zum anderen werden Erstellung und Nutzung der neu entwickelten Software emacs-reveal für die Erzeugung von für das Selbststudium geeigneten, mit Audiokommentaren unterlegten HTML-Präsentationen beschrieben; die Präsentationen werden in einfachen Textdateien erstellt, wobei die Erzeugung von HTML-Code automatisiert in einer öffentlichen GitLab-Infrastruktur abläuft und damit die Software-Nutzung vereinfacht. Ergebnisse einer Umfrage unter Studierenden verdeutlichen die Vorzüge der erzeugten Präsentationen.},
keywords = {Github, Hochschule, Informatik, O, open educational resources, Open Source},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@proceedings{wolters2018,
title = {Entwicklung einer effizienten Integrationslösung zur Bereitstellung von Vorlesungsfolien in hochschulischer Präsenzlehre},
author = {Christian Wolters and Nadine Flegel and Michael Herczeg},
editor = {Detlef Krömker and Ulrik Schroeder},
isbn = {978-3-88579-678-7},
year = {2018},
date = {2018-09-01},
booktitle = {DeLFI 2018 - Die 16. E-Learning Fachtagung Informatik},
pages = {81–92},
publisher = {Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V.},
address = {Bonn},
abstract = {Zur Arbeit mit digitalen Vorlesungsfolien in hochschulischer Präsenzlehre gehört nach der Vorbereitung und Präsentation auch das Bereitstellen und Verbreiten von Foliensätzen. Bei der Pflege des Präsentationsmediums und dessen Export aus dem Autorenwerkzeug in ein Learning Management System (LMS) können auf Grund nicht vorhandener Integration der beteiligten Systeme selbst bei kleinen Änderungen hohe Aufwände entstehen. Um das Optimierungspotential einer Integration zu untersuchen, wurde eine LTI-Schnittstelle zwischen einem web-basierten Autorenwerkzeug zur Erstellung von Vorlesungsfolien und einem LMS geschaffen und mit einem nicht-optimierten Arbeitsablauf verglichen. Im Rahmen eines menschzentrierten Entwicklungsprozesses wurde eine prototypische Integrationslösung entwickelt, die sowohl aufgabenorientiert, mittels GOMS-Analyse, als auch benutzerorientiert in einer Laborstudie evaluiert wurde.},
keywords = {A, GOMS-Analyse, LTI, Moodle, Präsenzlehre, Usability},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {proceedings}
}

@inbook{Seidel2018,
title = {Aufgabentypen für das Zusammenspiel von E-Assessment und Lernvideos},
author = {Niels Seidel},
editor = {Aline Bergert and Anje Lehmann and Maja Liebscher and Jens Schulz},
url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:105-qucosa2-312017},
isbn = {978-3-86012-575-5},
year = {2018},
date = {2018-08-10},
urldate = {2018-11-18},
booktitle = {Videocampus Sachsen – Machbarkeitsuntersuchung},
pages = {45–60},
publisher = {TU Bergakademie Freiberg},
address = {Freiberg},
edition = {1},
institution = {Medienzentrum der TU Bergakademie Freiberg},
series = {Freiberger Forschungshefte},
abstract = {Lernvideos werden oft als Instruktionsmedien verstanden, die Lerninhalte in audiovisueller Form konservieren und transportieren. Dieser Beitrag ergänzt diese Sichtweise um den Aspekt der Überprüfung des Lernerfolgs mit Hilfe von E-Assessments. Durch die Integration von speziellen Aufgabentypen in den Ablauf der Videowiedergabe können höhere Kompetenzlevel geprüft und weiterführende didaktische Intentionen, Lernszenarien und -formen umgesetzt werden. Im Rahmen der Verbundförderung des Videocampus Sachsen (VCS) konnten entsprechende Feldstudien ausgewertet und Pilotanwendungen im Rahmen des Innovationsvorhabens ViAssess entwickelt werden.},
keywords = {Assessment, e-Assessment, higher education, O, Saxony, teaching, video},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {inbook}
}

@article{Akcayir2018,
title = {The flipped classroom: A review of its advantages and challenges},
author = {Gökçe Akçayır and Murat Akçayır},
url = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360131518302045
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.07.021},
doi = {10.1016/j.compedu.2018.07.021},
issn = {0360-1315},
year = {2018},
date = {2018-08-01},
urldate = {2019-05-25},
journal = {Computers & Education},
volume = {126},
pages = {334–345},
abstract = {This study presents a large-scale systematic review of the literature on the flipped classroom, with the goals of examining its reported advantages and challenges for both students and instructors, and to note potentially useful areas of future research on the flipped model's in and out-of-class activities. The full range of Social Sciences Citation Indexed journals was surveyed through the Web of Science site, and a total of 71 research articles were selected for the review. The findings reveal that the most frequently reported advantage of the flipped classroom is the improvement of student learning performance. We also found a number of challenges in this model. The majority of these are related to out-of-class activities, such as much reported inadequate student preparation prior to class. Several other challenges and the numerous advantages of the flipped classroom are discussed in detail. We then offer suggestions for future research on flipped model activities.},
keywords = {Improving classroom teaching, O, Teaching/learning strategies},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{Butler2018,
title = {Multiple-Choice Testing in Education: Are the Best Practices for Assessment Also Good for Learning?},
author = {Andrew C. Butler},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2018.07.002
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211368118301426},
doi = {10.1016/j.jarmac.2018.07.002},
issn = {2211-3681},
year = {2018},
date = {2018-07-31},
urldate = {2018-10-20},
journal = {Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition},
volume = {7},
number = {3},
pages = {323–331},
abstract = {Multiple-choice tests are arguably the most popular type of assessment in education, and much research has been dedicated to determining best practices for using them to measure learning. The act of taking a test also causes learning, and numerous studies have investigated how best to use multiple-choice tests to improve long-term retention and produce deeper understanding. In this review article, I explore whether the best practices for assessment align with the best practices for learning. Although consensus between these two literatures is not a foregone conclusion, there is substantial agreement in how best to construct and use multiple-choice tests for these two disparate purposes. The overall recommendation from both literatures is to create questions that are simple in format (e.g., avoid use of complex item types), challenge students but allow them to succeed often, and target specific cognitive processes that correspond to learning objectives.},
keywords = {Assessment, Learning, Multiple-choice, O, Testing},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{vandezee2018,
title = {Open Education Science},
author = {Tim van der Zee and Justin Reich},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858418787466},
doi = {10.1177/2332858418787466},
year = {2018},
date = {2018-07-16},
journal = {AERA Open},
volume = {4},
number = {3},
pages = {1–15},
abstract = {Scientific progress is built on research that is reliable, accurate, and verifiable. The methods and evidentiary reasoning that underlie scientific claims must be available for scrutiny. Like other fields, the education sciences suffer from problems such as failure to replicate, validity and generalization issues, publication bias, and high costs of access to publications—all of which are symptoms of a nontransparent approach to research. Each aspect of the scientific cycle—research design, data collection, analysis, and publication—can and should be made more transparent and accessible. Open Education Science is a set of practices designed to increase the transparency of evidentiary reasoning and access to scientific research in a domain characterized by diverse disciplinary traditions and a commitment to impact in policy and practice. Transparency and accessibility are functional imperatives that come with many benefits for the individual researcher, scientific community, and society at large—Open Education Science is the way forward.},
keywords = {O, open access, open science, preregistration, registered report},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{Schwab2018,
title = {Television Is Still “Easy” and Print Is Still “Tough”? More Than 30 Years of Research on the Amount of Invested Mental Effort},
author = {Frank Schwab and Christine Hennighausen and Dorothea C. Adler and Astrid Carolus},
url = {https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01098},
doi = {10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01098},
isbn = {1664-1078},
year = {2018},
date = {2018-07-03},
journal = {Frontiers in Psychology},
volume = {9},
number = {1098},
pages = {1-17},
abstract = {We provide a literature overview of 30 years of research on the amount of invested mental effort (AIME, Salomon, 1984), illuminating relevant literature in this field. Since the introduction of AIME, this concept appears to have vanished. To obtain a clearer picture of where the theory of AIME has diffused, we conducted a literature search focusing on the period 1985–2015. We examined scientific articles (N = 244) that cite Salomon (1984) and content-analyzed their keywords. Based on these keywords, we identified seven content clusters: affect and motivation, application fields, cognition and learning, education and teaching, media technology, learning with media technology, and methods. We present selected works of each content cluster and describe in which research field the articles had been published. Results indicate that AIME was most commonly (but not exclusively) referred to in the area of educational psychology indicating its importance regarding learning and education, thereby investigating print and TV, as well as new media. From a methodological perspective, research applied various research methods (e.g., longitudinal studies, experimental designs, theoretical analysis) and samples (e.g., children, college students, low income families). From these findings, the importance of AIME for further research is discussed.},
keywords = {AIME, amount of invested mental effort, content cluster, content-analysis, literature review},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{Hessler2018,
title = {Availability of cookies during an academic course session affects evaluation of teaching},
author = {Michael Hessler and Daniel M Pöpping and Hanna Hollstein and Hendrik Ohlenburg and Philip H Arnemann and Christina Massoth and Laura M Seidel and Alexander Zarbock and Manuel Wenk},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13627},
doi = {10.1111/medu.13627},
issn = {1365-2923},
year = {2018},
date = {2018-06-29},
urldate = {2018-11-19},
journal = {Medical Education},
volume = {52},
number = {10},
pages = {1064–1072},
abstract = {Objectives Results from end-of-course student evaluations of teaching (SETs) are taken seriously by faculties and form part of a decision base for the recruitment of academic staff, the distribution of funds and changes to curricula. However, there is some doubt as to whether these evaluation instruments accurately measure the quality of course content, teaching and knowledge transfer. We investigated whether the provision of chocolate cookies as a content-unrelated intervention influences SET results. Methods We performed a randomised controlled trial in the setting of a curricular emergency medicine course. Participants were 118 third-year medical students. Participants were randomly allocated into 20 groups, 10 of which had free access to 500 g of chocolate cookies during an emergency medicine course session (cookie group) and 10 of which did not (control group). All groups were taught by the same teachers. Educational content and course material were the same for both groups. After the course, all students were asked to complete a 38-question evaluation form. Results A total of 112 students completed the evaluation form. The cookie group evaluated teachers significantly better than the control group (113.4 ± 4.9 versus 109.2 ± 7.3; p = 0.001, effect size 0.68). Course material was considered better (10.1 ± 2.3 versus 8.4 ± 2.8; p = 0.001, effect size 0.66) and summation scores evaluating the course overall were significantly higher (224.5 ± 12.5 versus 217.2 ± 16.1; p = 0.008, effect size 0.51) in the cookie group. Conclusions The provision of chocolate cookies had a significant effect on course evaluation. These findings question the validity of SETs and their use in making widespread decisions within a faculty.},
keywords = {A, cookies, evaluation, influence, teaching},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{MacLeod2018,
title = {The mitigating effect of repeated memory reactivations on forgetting},
author = {Sydney MacLeod and Michael G. Reynolds and Hugo Lehmann},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-018-0025-x},
doi = {10.1038/s41539-018-0025-x},
issn = {2056-7936},
year = {2018},
date = {2018-04-24},
urldate = {2018-06-12},
journal = {npj Science of Learning},
volume = {9},
number = {3},
abstract = {Memory reactivation is a process whereby cueing or recalling a long-term memory makes it enter a new active and labile state. Substantial evidence suggests that during this state the memory can be updated (e.g., adding information) and can become more vulnerable to disruption (e.g., brain insult). Memory reactivations can also prevent memory decay or forgetting. However, it is unclear whether cueing recall of a feature or component of the memory can benefit retention similarly to promoting recall of the entire memory. We examined this possibility by having participants view a series of neutral images and then randomly assigning them to one of four reactivation groups: control (no reactivation), distractor (reactivation of experimental procedures), component (image category reactivation), and descriptive (effortful description of the images). The experiment also included three retention intervals: 1 h, 9 days, and 28 days. Importantly, the participants received three reactivations equally spaced within their respective retention interval. At the end of the interval, all the participants were given an in-lab free-recall test in which they were asked to write down each image they remembered with as many details as possible. The data revealed that both the participants in the descriptive reactivation and component reactivation groups remembered significantly more than the participants in the control groups, with the effect being most pronounced in the 28-day retention interval condition. These findings suggest that memory reactivation, even component reactivation of a memory, makes memories more resistant to decay.},
keywords = {A, memory, psychology, recall, remember, repetition},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@inproceedings{Khalil2018,
title = {Gamification in MOOCs: A Review of the State of the Art (Draft)},
author = {Mohammad Khalil and Jacqueline Wong and Björn de Koning and Martin Ebner and Fred Paas},
url = {https://www.researchgate.net/publication/324528892_Gamification_in_MOOCs_A_Review_of_the_State_of_the_Art},
year = {2018},
date = {2018-04-01},
urldate = {2018-05-16},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference},
pages = {1635–1644},
address = {Santa Cruz, Tenerife, Canary Islands, Spains},
abstract = {A Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) is a type of online learning environment that has the potential to increase students' access to education. However, the low completion rates in MOOCs suggest that student engagement and progression in the courses are problematic. Following the increasing adoption of gamification in education, it is possible that gamification can also be effectively adopted in MOOCs to enhance students' motivation and increase completion rates. Yet at present, the extent to which gamification has been examined in MOOCs is not known. Considering the myriad gamification elements that can be adopted in MOOCs (e.g., leaderboards and digital badges), this theoretical research study reviews scholarly publications examining gamification of MOOCs. The main purpose is to provide an overview of studies on gamification in MOOCs, types of research studies, theories applied, gamification elements implemented, methods of implementation, the overall impact of gamification in MOOCs, and the challenges faced by researchers and practitioners when implementing gamification in MOOCs. The results of the literature study indicate that research on gamification in MOOCs is in its early stages. While there are only a handful of empirical research studies, results of the experiments generally showed a positive relation between gamification and student motivation and engagement. It is concluded that there is a need for further studies using educational theories to account for the effects of employing gamification in MOOCs.},
keywords = {A, gamification, literature review, massive open online courses (MOOCs)},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {inproceedings}
}

@article{Friedrichs2018,
title = {Smartphones im Unterricht – Wollen das Schülerinnen und Schüler überhaupt?! Eine explorative Studie zum Smartphone-Einsatz an weiterführenden Schulen aus der Sicht von Schülerinnen und Schülern},
author = {Henrike Friedrichs-Liesenkötter and Philip Karsch},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.21240/mpaed/31/2018.03.30.X},
doi = {10.21240/mpaed/31/2018.03.30.X},
issn = {1424-3636},
year = {2018},
date = {2018-03-28},
journal = {MedienPädagogik: Zeitschrift für Theorie und Praxis der Medienbildung},
volume = {31},
number = {März},
pages = {107–124},
abstract = {Mit Blick auf empirische Studien zum Einsatz digitaler Medien in Schulen werden bisher vor allem die Haltungen von Lehrpersonen in den Blick genommen und die Haltungen von Schülerinnen und Schüler gegenüber digitalen Medien in der Schule kaum betrachtet. An diesem Forschungsdesiderat anknüpfend, wurde im Juni/Juli 2015 eine explorative qualitative Studie durchgeführt, in der zwei Gruppendiskussionen mit Schülerinnen und Schülern weiterführender Schulen in Nordrhein-Westfalen durchgeführt wurden. Mittels der dokumentarischen Methode nach Bohnsack (2013) wurden die medienbezogenen Haltungen der Schülerinnen und Schüler im Hinblick auf die Nutzung digitaler Medien und spezifisch des Smartphones in der Schule rekonstruiert. Ein zentrales Ergebnis der Studie ist eine kritisch-reflexive Haltung der Schülerinnen und Schüler und der Wunsch nach einem auf spezifische Unterrichtsphasen beschränkten Einsatz digitaler Medien.},
keywords = {A, classroom, digitalization, mobile learning, school, Smartphones, teaching},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}